RS> I happen to think that SOT/EOT is a great idea.

ac> SOT/EOT has merit, but I cannot say the same for Paul's proposal, 
ac> unfortunately.

Why?  You would be happy if I split the document into 3?  BTW,
I asked you why you weren't sure you could conform to the 
proposal, and didn't receive a reply.  SOT/EOT is meant to be
simple to generate.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---