"FredW"  wrote in message news:lgs5r91elu6ls53ijmhd6outdujceo8r93@7ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:12:30 +0200, FredW  wrote:
>>On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:35:27 -0600, "Buffalo"
>
>>>
>>>Just checked my Pro MBAM (ver: 1.75.0.1300) the memory usage on my Win7 
>>>HE
>>>64 bit system running in real time, not doing a scan, and it is aprox 
>>>370MB
>>>of ram. WoW!  WOW!!
>>>mbamgui.exe *32 = 11.MB
>>>mbamservice.exe *32 = 254MB
>>>mbamscheduler.exe *32 = 107MB
>>
>>
>>I use Win7HP64SP1 and MBAM Pro (ver. 1.75.0.1300) real-time.
>>mbamgui.exe *32 = 3.572 K
>>mbamscheduelr.exe *32 = 4.020 K
>>mbamservice.exe *32 = 63.840 K
>>
>>when I start the scanner and do nothing:
>>mbam.exe *32 = 130.844 K
>>
>>Maybe the memory usage increases over time?
>>
>>Started a full scan,
>>mbam.exe *32 = 137.xxx - 162.xxx (peak) K
>
>Later on ...
>Scheduled full scan is running.
>
>mbam.exe *32 = 209.576 K +/-  (211.412 K when scan is completed.)
>mbamgui.exe *32 = 3.712 K
>mbamscheduler.exe *32 = 4.060 K
>mbamservice.exe *32 = 67.096 K
>
>mbam.exe *32 is gone when scanner is closed after full scan.
>

My mbam.exe *32 is also gone unless the scanner is actually running.
Amazed at the difference in memory usage between your computor and mine, 
unless your numbers are those when MBAM is not being used for real time 
protection.
Still, a tremendous difference.
My mbamscheduler.exe *32   107MB  compared to your reading of 4KB
mbamservice.exe *32  254MB  compared to your reading of 67KB

I don't understand why!!  :(

-- 
Buffalo 

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2