Thus spake huarriahalvalla{at}gmail.com :

>On 14 maalis, 01:09, "Mac Breck"  wrote:
>> huarriahalva...{at}gmail.com wrote:
>> > On 12 maalis, 19:08, "Mac Breck"
 wrote:
>> >> Allen Prunty wrote:
>> >>> To: Dillon Pyron
>>
>> >>>> "Dresden Files"? "Painkiller
Jane"? Both new ones. Did you watch
>> >>>> them?
>>
>> >>> Unsure about the fate of PKJ but Dresden Files
doesn't look like
>> >>> it's coming back.
>>
>> >>> Scifi's most annoying thing is they bring on GOOD
shows and cancel
>> >>> them...
>>
>> >> IOW, they're impersonating FOX. FOX just cancels them quicker.
>>
>> >>> Scifi needs to go back to it's Roots... Sci-Fi Shows that don't
>> >>> suck.
>>
>> >> The leadership at The Sci-Fi Channel hates the channel's roots, and
>> >> the fans of those roots.
>>
>> > Maybe the shareholders should reconsider their position on the
>> > leadership.
>>
>> Shareholders couldn't care less if The Sci-Fi Channel is actually a
>> sci-fi channel.  All the shareholders care about is whether or not the
>> channel makes as much profit as possible.
>>
>Obviously. But does something called scifi make money if it is not
>scifi. They could change it into horror channel or make a new channel
>for horror.

SciFi channel has a very high ROI.  Not great revenue, but a very good
margin.  I don't have my last annual report, but they beat the crap
out of everybody else.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32