Not content to enjoy the fruits of the obscurity to which he is so
splendidly suited, Dan Triplett ventured out to add his two cents to 
Matt Smiths Post:  
MS>PS> MS>PS> So I guess the real question here is "Are there citizens
MS>PS> of  this
MS>PS> MS>PS> country, or any specific State in the Union who can be
MS>PS> MS>PS> denied services
MS>PS> MS>PS> normally allowed to all?"
MS>PS>  
MS>    Yes.
MS>    Of course there are American citizens with no entitlement to a
MS>given  service.  School attendance is limited to those legally
MS>residing in a  school attendance zone.  A kid can have been born in a
MS>school district and  he has no "right" to attend the schools there if
MS>his parents move  abroad...
Let me see if I get this right...A kid is born in America and grows up 
in a certain American school district.  Since he lives in that district 
he is entitled to attend that district's schools.  However, his parents 
move to Siberia.  So now, naturally, he would have to go to school in 
Siberia.  It wouldn't make sense to argue that since he is born in a 
particular school district in America (which has nothing to do with 
attendance requirements...but I think you meant he was living in a 
school district zone) that he would have the right to attend school 
there once he has left.  It wouldn't matter if the kid moved across 
town.  Once you leave a school district (generally speaking) you may no 
longer attend that school.  
So, if the kids parents move abroad, they would hardly care to commute 
across the ocean some 2000 miles (give or take) just so the kid could 
attend a school here.  Even if they had the "right."  It seems a silly 
example..
Just thinking out loud here...
Dan Triplett
CMPQwk 1.42 445p
"... terrible pain in all the diodes down my left hand side..."
* ++++++  *
     _   /|    ACK!
     \'o.O'   /
     =(__)+
       U
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
---------------