Eddy Thilleman wrote in a message to Steve Mccrystal:

ET>> 9 lazy write workers? I haven't seen mentioned that high before.

SM> I noticed that, and hadn't seen it before either, so I checked the
SM> online docs. They say that LAZY takes one of two parameters... OFF or
SM> ON.

SM> I then modified my own cache statement, changing LAZY:3 to LAZY:9
SM> and the resulting display shows there are indeed 9 lazy workers
SM> allocated.  I have no idea what difference it might make, especially
SM> given the obvious inaccuracy of the docs, but I think I'll play with
SM> it a bit! :^)

 ET> It optimizes writing to disk, so the system looses less
 ET> performance with disk-intensive applications. I don't have
 ET> any more information. 

I, and someone recently in here, had problems with modum overrun errors after
installing newer IBM1S506.add drivers.  I know I messed around a good bit
trying to change paramaters in the driver to fix it, and ended up going back
to the old driver, which works fine.  I wonder if this LAZY cache thing would
fix that?  Sounds like it might.
                                              Jack 
--- timEd/2-B11