| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Blimey `Is software patentable` reaches the SC |
From: Ad & oddly MS is the defendant..... http://www.betanews.com/article/Supreme_Court_Debates_Patentability_of_Software /1172097039 "A seemingly simple case regarding whether Microsoft had the right to replicate speech recognition software it had licensed -- or rather, thought it had licensed -- from AT&T, and then sell that software abroad as a component of Windows Vista, has exploded into what is now extremely likely to become a landmark case in US patent and copyright law. The US Supreme Court today took up oral arguments in Microsoft's appeal of a judgment against it in AT&T v. Microsoft, which has now become Microsoft v. AT&T in view of the appeal. During oral arguments this morning, Microsoft attorney Theodore Olson, responding to a barrage of questions from Justices Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia, attacked AT&T's position with a novel argument that you might not expect to hear from Microsoft: In short, you can't patent source code or object code. "An idea or a principle [such as] two plus two equals four can't be patented," Olson told the Justices. "It has to be put together with a machine and made into a usable device." Acknowledging both Kennedy's and Scalia's questions, Olson built a case against AT&T's position: For foreign replication to work, a golden disk is shipped abroad to the replication service, containing the master of the Vista operating system that includes AT&T's drivers. It's not software at that point, Olson says, because no one can execute it. When it's installed onto a hard drive, then it becomes software, and it's the end customer who does that. If you accept that argument, Olson's case goes on, then Microsoft did not copy AT&T's software. And since the physical components - the hard drive, processor, and optical drive - necessary for the copying process to happen may or may not have been supplied by manufacturers in the US, then US courts may not have jurisdiction anyway." Blimey......this could cause real ructions...... Hooorraaaay.....finally a reason to like MS....(or probably more accurately their lawyers)....I'll be curious to see if Balmer will throw any chairs at the lawyers. Adam --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.