| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | no more ugly gun ban |
DB> VH> Combat is not norm-referenced. It is no comfort to die DB> VH> knowing that, while your rifle didn't do the job, it did DB> VH> a little better than some other rifle. DB>Hi Vern, what you're telling me here, is that you'd rather have an M-16 than DB>M-1 Carbine, which is what my point was. No, I'd rather have an M1 or M14. On my second tour, I was a company commander and I bullied my battalion commander into getting me two M14 sniper rifles (this was before the M21 was standardized.) I carried one of them myself. DB> VH> As a company commander, I used to charge $50 for firing DB> VH> full auto -- and that's with the M16. DB>I'm sorry, Vern, but that is either untrue, or you're a criminal. Only the C DB>of a unit, as in a Captain's Mast, or a GCM can dock a serviceman of his pay Under Article 15, a company commander can levy fines as part of Non-Jusicial Punishment -- read the UCMJ. DB> VH> Full auto fire from hand-held weapons is DB> VH> completely useless in combat. DB>Every nation who could afford it, has developed full auto hand held weapons DB>their soldiers. Not quite true -- the current US standard rifles (M16A2 and A4) are burst control weapons, not full auto. The latest Soviet weapon is a two-shot burst. My own experience is that good training and proper fire control are far more effective than spray and pray. ................................................... --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5* Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 123/140 500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.