08 Feb 07 00:59, mark lewis wrote to Thom LaCosta:


 JS>>      Not trying to be antagonistic here Thom. But what real purpose
 JS>> is there for you to have a listing in the nodelist in your capacity
 JS>> as echolist manager if nodes within Fidonet can not use that entry
 JS>> to contact you on echolist matters?

 TL>> Perhaps you have forgotten that routed netmail works...many people
 TL>> use that method instead of email.

 ml> sorry... if the listing of the echotags requires a password, why
 ml> would anyone use a non-secure method of transport unless they simply
 ml> didn't care if it was swipped from them?? nope, no thanks...

No one thinks the elist is any authority on echotags anymore. I recently
removed a user from the HAM echo without varification that I'm the
moderator of that echo by reference to the elist. (The HAM echotag has
been elisted by Thom LaCosta)

By regularly posting the echo rules in the echo on a weekly basis, that
was all the proof I needed.

               R\%/itt




--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000