-=> Quoting Bill Nichols to CHRISTOPHER TARANA <=-
 
  I meant the primary definition, to pass down from an original,
 BN> not the usually secondary one of degeneration & deterioration. ;)
        Nit! :-)
 BN> I don't think anyone would argue that the novels are children of
 BN> the parent show. 
        Nor would I, but I don't think they are superior either.
 
 BN> This is true.  But do the novels then take precedence over their
 BN> Creator?  Don't think much of a case could be made for that one.
        Not precedence over, but give them their due credit as vehicles
which to explore other events germane to the overall story.
 BN> with is the fact that a number of people do in fact take the novels
 BN> as superior to the show.  This makes a sum total of 0 sense, to me
 BN> at least. :)
        I agree!
 
 BN> Uh, could you run that one by me again??  The novels are correct &
 BN> the show they wouldn't even exist without isn't?  Hmm.  This one I
 BN> think I may have to do some extra thinking on.... 
        Think SUBjectively, not OBjectively.  Look at each reader/viewers 
V.
 BN>  I don't think we're talking about the same person here.
 
        Can't be!  Who cares?
 
 BN> roflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflrofl
        Glad I could make your day! 
                Christopher
... We know what we are, but know not what we may be. -Shakespeare
--- PCBoard/2 15.30
---------------