Hello Herbert,

05 Dec 99 15:04, Herbert Rosenau wrote to Eddy Thilleman:

HR> run=f:\os2\cache.exe /LAZY:9 /MAXAGE:12500 /DISKIDLE:7500
HR> /BUFFERIDLE:2000 /READAHEAD:1

9 lazy write workers? I haven't seen mentioned that high before.

Is there something like a rule of thumb for this, or a relation between how
much disk intensive an application is, the disk throughput and the number of
lazy write workers? Is there a trade-off, for example more lazy write workers
need more memory? If so, how much?

HR> It depends on your system usage.

It always depends on your system usage, I know. :)

HR> Yes, disk caching is the most recent parameter on it.

I don't know what you mean with this. Can you clarify this? Didn't you use the 
cache command before?

  Greetings   -=Eddy=-        email: eddy.thilleman@net.hcc.nl

... A teenage male can do it every 20 minutes! It's true!
--- GoldED/2 3.0.1
772/1