EC> Of course that is not what I said.  Sauer and I said he was
 EC> NOT convicted. You say he was.  You are wrong, and you

-> You keep saying that, but I did not find it. I downloaded the echo
-> from Docsplace, back to Feb 11. Did not find it. You will have to
-> give me some actual text to do a search for.

It was the subject of a good number of posts on Feb 9, 10 and 11, which
is why I told you Sauer had ALREADY indicated that Bosch was NOT
convicted before you falsely claimed that he HAD been convicted.  That
makes your stopping point of Feb 11 rather strange.  Actual text?  Hmmm,
try "Bosch."  In fact, try posts from sauer with the text Bosch in them.

You will also find this prediction: "Klahn, on the other hand, will
refuse to back down an inch.  He'll make up some fake story, or he will
concoct some superficial word game, or he will try to divert attention
with some meaningless insult.  It is always the same."  Turns out you
did all three!  And you will continue....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10