"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote in
news:3ifi5a97701og4fd5f8rf4es7us5f0rr3r@4ax.com: 

> You bleeding moron. Those are the links I posted when you said
> irok would infect Windows 8. irok cannot infect Windows 8 for a
> number of reasons. One of those is that MSE is built in and
> definitions for irok are included. I posted those links to prove
> it. 

Actually, you're confused. As usual. I suspect another md5 is a 
checksum type thread is on the way.
 
> I then went on to find another half a dozen mitigations why irok
> wouldn't infect Windows 8.

No, you didn't. You sidestepped the lack of worm ability by ignoring 
it's an executable file infector as well. Even when that was brought to 
your attention, you ignored it/deflected.
 


-- 
As a computer, I find your faith in technology amusing.



--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2