BA> She's fine.  The only damage was to my wallet .  I'm just glad

 There is an doggie ER where my daughter lives. When we were still in
FW we had to take Cosmo .. they were wonderful with him but yeah it
does cost as much as though it were an ER for humans. The Technology
has caught up and on in both vet and human medicine... and we're all paying for
it.

YOu do know a lot of this scanning business is way over done. :( It's
fascinating yes! And 'they' learn to read the scans by doing them and
getting better at it.. but who is paying and sometimes you wonder if
the scan was needed at all. Think about that oh good people .. think
about that.


This is not reflecting on you personally Bob. It is more to a
disclaimer as it were and hopefully a preventive... To say:

I am not saying " OH MY FOG ban the scans".. NO. That is not what I am
saying. Some people have/will accuse me of being anti tech. NO.
I am not anti tech. I am not anti drug use either for that matter. Why
they think that way isn't my problem so I won't make it mine.

What I am anti about is Overuse. Employing High tech/drug methods when
less expensive holistic methods serves the same purpose which
should be meeting the patient's needs rather than lining the
medical /drug professional's wallets. I do not know how to make
this point more clear.

If somebody can help me out in this way, please do! Tell me how to
make this point more clear. Thanks!

PS: Why, you might ask, does this issue annoy me so much? Okay.
It annoys me because many a time I have seen such over use of
technology/drugs and all it amounts to is the exact same results
the less expensive methods would have.

Is that okay? I've seen it happen too many times. :(
The Ultimate Catch-22.

Cindy



... There's nothing good on TV but a vase of wild flowers.

--- PPoint 3.01