From: Bill Lucy 

Out of darkness, Geo. says...
> "Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
> news:MPG.1872f623d24b16e598b1d0{at}news.barkto.com...
>
> > That's not economically viable in an oil field of any size. You're talking
> hundreds
> > of acres of land. There's not enough anthrax in the world to cause a
> significant
> > problem.
>
> Less than an ounce contaminated a postoffice and a HUGE building and you
> don't think there is enough to contaminate a decent sized chunk of land?

That particular sample didn't even contaminate a whole building. The building was
quarantined only on threat of contamination. Open air is quite a bit different.


> >And "radioactive dust"? Watchoobinsmokin?
>
> it's a brand called beentochernobyllately..

I'd rather not think how one would transport tons of radioactive material for that
purpose, let alone sowing it among a large area. And it would require tons.
Otherwise, you end up with background radiation. Shale in areas where there
is oil
has a higher level of radiation than normal, BTW.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4