-=> Quoting Jack Sargeant to Michael Tauson <=-
 >      Does anyone have the exact wording of the NSA's response to
 > this?
 JS> The oldie but still goodie is, "There is no evidence that UFOs are
 JS> a threat to national security." (paraphrased) I think this came out
 JS> in the 1960s sometime. ...Or maybe at the close of Project Bluebook.
     Hmmm, for something that's no threat to national security, 
there does seem to be a rather large cloak of secrecy wrapped 
around them under the guise of "national security".  
     Now, you know me as a skeptic (skeptibunker?).  But I tend 
to find myself in the middle, equally skeptical of both sides.  
While I know of no evidence that indicates without doubt that 
there are or ever have been alien visitations to Earth, I also 
know of no evidence that shows there haven't been either.  This 
is a difficult position to be in - equally distanced from both 
sides of the discussion - but it is, in my never humble opinion, 
a rational approach to the question of an alien element being 
involved with these events.  
     With the NSA's response to CAUS compared to the above 
statement, I think I have reason to be skeptical of the 
government's position (or lack thereof) as well.
 JS> At any rate, it's about the closest the government has come to
 JS> admitting the existance of UFOs.
     *chuckling* ... some admission.  Er, was it an election 
year? 
Michael
... We now return to our regularly scheduled flame-throwing.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--- Maximus 3.01
---------------