-=> Quoting Tom Furie to John Rambo <=-
 TF> From what I remember, if you run interserver on one machine and
 TF> interlink on the other, the machine running interlink has access to the
 TF> drives on the machine running interserver. The drawback is that you
 TF> can't actually use the machine running interserver for anything other
 TF> than being an extra drive or two for the machine running interlink.
That's right, except...
Here use DesqView on the server, so can serve a client via Interlnk Terbo
in one DOS window, and the BBS in the other.  Client's WfWG3.11 and all
drives on the server are available in File Manager at the client
Guess OS/2 would do that too since both are true multi-taskers (oh no, not
that thread again :)
 TF> I know this message seems a bit long-winded, but what do you expect
 TF> with words like 'interserver' and 'interlink'? :)
Havn't tried Brooklyn Bridge and it's "self-cloning" gizmo tho
rgdZ
Richard
--- FMail/386 1.02
---------------