HI Roger,

On Thu 2037-Dec-17 09:37, Roger Nelson (1:3828/7) wrote to Richard Webb:

RW> Can't speak for Bob, but, in my case, this one was done when she was
RW> still a puppy by the breeder.  I was totally
RW> amenable to that in fact, as they've promised me that this
RW> bit of big brother tech will assure me that if my dog is
RW> found somewhere other than where she should be there's a
RW> good chance for her being reunited with her people.


RN> I think I answered my own question in a subsequent message.


RN>


RN> None of our 5 dogs have them.
Yah can see that too.  My life circumstances can change
fairly radically in short order though, so the chip is an
added safeguard for me.  IF business didn't have me
traveling now and then, and dog going along I probably
wouldn't worry as much about it.

RN>  
RW> She'd sure roam now if given the chance, her December heat's upon her
RW> again, and the Pitweiler's lurking about thinking
RW> he'd like to get better acquainted, again.

RN> Only our oldest female displays a preponderance for that, but she's
RN> easy enough to catch and when I do, she goes into her "I'm sorry"
RN> mode.
YEp, just means I go outside with her even if she's on her
tether so that I can run him off.


RW> Got to send Kathy to the library again before June when she
RW> goes into heat again to troll the AKC web resources again
RW> looking for Mr. Right .

RN> I did that with one of my German shepherds.

GOnna let her have one litter anyway.  Just not with the
PIttweiler .



Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+