| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Oz Terror `Shoot To Kill` |
Shoot to kill: new move by Howard 23oct05 PRIME Minister John Howard is considering spelling out in legislation the circumstances under which police can shoot to kill as part of his new package of anti-terrorism laws. The detailing of the precise conditions under which police may use lethal force is one option being examined as a way of satisfying the concerns of all state premiers over the laws. The premiers revolted last week over the shoot-to-kill provisions but Mr Howard needs the agreement of the state leaders to put key elements of the anti-terror laws into force. Mr Howard has argued the right of police to shoot dead suspects when they threaten the lives of others or the police themselves has been lifted straight from existing state criminal codes. But the problem, from the premiers' perspective, is the circumstances were tightly proscribed in state laws, whereas Mr Howard is proposing they be applied to the new and much more nebulous idea of "preventive detention" as it applies to suspected terrorists. Mr Howard is examining a range of solutions, including the possibility of creating a specific offence related to preventive detention that would allow police to use lethal force: for example, where a suspect "refuses to co-operate with a detention order". The police would be able to act if they believed a suspect's non-co- operation could cause serious injury or death to others. "The police will then know what their rights are in that situation," one senior government source said. "At present the police are not sure what their rights are. "The problem is leaving it (the offence) undefined. Codifying the circumstances in which police could use shoot-to-kill or reasonable force provisions would give certainty and clarity to them u and also to any potential victim," the source said. Mr Howard signalled a possible shift on Friday when he said the shoot- to-kill provisions did not go to the heart of the anti-terrorism laws. "I'm sure that in further discussions with the premiers we can reach some compromise or understanding," he said. The Law Council objects to allowing police to use lethal force under the new laws, saying police now acted when they had reasonable grounds to make an arrest and lay charges, when they or others were at risk of harm. The council says Mr Howard's legislation should be withdrawn because people not even suspected of having committed an offence could be detained and subject to shoot-to-kill powers. Source: "Sunday Mail" - Adelaide http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/ 0,5936,17005377%255E911,00.html Cheers, Steve.. ---* Origin: Xaragmata / Adelaide SA telnet://xaragmata.thebbs.org (3:800/432) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 800/432 633/260 261/38 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.