"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote in
news:u13h5apbuekl4ohkuimtp24q7q9p1j14nj@4ax.com: 

> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 01:55:54 +0000 (UTC), Dustin
>  wrote:
> 
>>"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote
>>in news:scje5a19mnvmfn0ul1p7vonmc7e6u0658b@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), Dustin 
>>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Obviously your definition of inaccurate is inaccurate. Not
>>>>> really surprising.
>>>>
>>>>Ahh. lexicon spin. Cute, but your known for doing this already.
>>>>I want to see something new!
>>> 
>>> See ya Dustin. You're not worth my time. 
>>
>>I didn't think you'd want to participate in this discussion for
>>any length of time. You tried to isolate a single statement I made
>>(which was very generic in nature) and roll with that only. That's
>>the *only* reason I took the time to write the long post. Covering
>>most of the bases. Leaving you no wiggle room.
> 
> You make me larf. The old hub vs switch debate is something from
> the dark ages. I haven't seen a hub in about 15 years. I remember
> the last one I swapped out, several ports blown and it was really
> old then and I was a bit surprised anyone was still using one.

what ####ing debate? I said a hub was easier to do network snooping 
with, as it repeats everything on all the damn ports. By default, a 
switch doesn't do that. Switch is smarter. HUB is.. well, a dumb 
device.
 
>>> I just proved you wrong. Deal with it, and if you think I'm
>>> going 
>>
>>No, you didn't. Instead, you chose to intentionally isolate a
>>single sentence, out of context and try to troll me with it. This
>>is no different than your pathetic attempt to troll with the
>>exevalid thread and the demo threads. When I posted the smallest
>>one, you quipped I used a 'hacked' header. You've *never*
>>clarified that statement.
> 
> About time you got over the whipping I gave you over EXEVALID as
> well. 

What whipping? Dude, you made some bull#### claims about it and the 
language used to write it. You modified math routines and originally 
tried taking credit for it; stopping only when I shared twenty year 
old source code already doing it. [g] You kept wasting resources with 
math routines that were all doing the same thing. Mine was more 
efficient at it.

You eventually decided you didn't even need to complete file 
operations to save size; laughable and a joke. And, despite the no 
longer closing an open file, you still lost.

Quit writing bull####.

You didn't whip me with exevalid anymore so than you whipped me on 
the American Power Grid discussion. What you write just doesn't match 
reality.
 
> You waffling on about some dead technology like some old fart at a
> country club. The future in ahead of you. Way ahead.

#### you, IT poseur. Oh, now it's waffling on about dead technology.. 
Why, it's so ####ing dead n all, that newer switches have the ability 
to emulate it... Nice... so much for dead technology.
 
> Hubs are dead. 

Says who?

> Some hacker you are boyo. 

Ayep, that I am. Btw, did you notice the linky BD shared from 
microsoft.com concerning irok? seems they consider it a valid threat 
to windows 7/8.1 machines. They added detection nearly eight (8) 
years after it was released, poohskie.

You're a poseur, you know it, I know it, some others here do too. 
Save that ass if you can!
 


-- 
As a computer, I find your faith in technology amusing.



--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2