From: "Adam Flinton" 


"Geo."  wrote in message
news:3e08af0a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
> news:3e08407e{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> > Hohum........why would that be a problem? Oil comes from out of the rock
> so
> > it would be comparatively easy to seal the whole thing from rock >
> pipeline
> > > collecting station many miles away (heck they do that 300 ft down
under
> > the north sea).
>
> You're kidding right? They couldn't even put out the fires last time. Coat
> the area with anthrax power and the problem is a whole lot more serious.
> Coat it with radioactive dust and it's worse.
>

Why is that any worse than working in/under the north sea? Start breathing
sea water 300 foot down & see how long you last.

> > Imagine GWB now w/o 9-11 & with the economy in the skip/the same
condition
> > it is now. % in favour of him would be low. % in favour of going after
> Iraq
> > (he would have brought it up w/o 9-11) would have been even smaller.
>
> What makes you think the economy would be in the same condition without
> 9/11? That was an economic center that was blown up you know.. Why do you
> think it was the target, don't you think there are other tall buildings
that
> would have been a lot easier to hit?
>

Miniscule effect wrt the entire US & world econ. The Econ was already
headed where we are now.

> The Administration has tried to cover up just how much of an economic hit
> 9/11 was.
>

Nah.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4