Rod, at 10:12 on Jun 10 1995, you wrote to Bill Grimsley...

BG> Nope, that #2 definition accurately describes my original intention,

RS> Nope, you are engaging in pathetic faking. That one makes no sense in
RS> your original, which your keep carefully deleting so no one can check.

I always delete as much as possible, no faking involved.  You know that.

BG> and I stand by it unreservedly.

RS> You can stand wherever you like Bill, wont make
RS> the pathetic faking any more convincing tho |-)

I'm not in the mood Rod.  One fuckwit in this echo is enough.

BG> Anyway, I demand a second opinion...  Frank ??  |-)

RS> Who cares what Frank thinks, he is just a pathetic yuppie, mind totally
RS> addled with all the chemicals he needs to get the day in a haze of.

Dunno what you're trying to say here.  The last bit makes no sense at all.

RS> Your 'wonderfully prosaic' just plain doesnt fit #2, you are faking |-)

BG> Nope, you're the one who complains bitterly and incessantly about
BG> "anality", yet you won't even acknowledge that in its context,

RS> Its bullshit Bill.

Pig's arse it is.

BG> mine is a perfectly valid (and correct) use of that word.

RS> Yes, but it doesnt fit the original usage. Yes, its technically
RS> correct, but the original comment is essentially meaningless. 

Oh crap.

RS> We already know those were prose,

You and I might, but I'm sure many others don't.

RS> so the 'wonderfully prosaic' makes no sense at all in the context. QED, you 
RS> are faking away your blooper.

Bullshit.  Are you trying to be intentionally obnoxious, or what?

BG> Ask Stew, he'll tell you the same thing.

RS> Nope, he can pick faking very well indeed. And fakes himself too.

Funny, I don't see QC or LLB after your name, nor have I seen you on the ABC.

BG> Oh well, at least I can correctly spell obsession,
BG> indictment, fundamental, etc., etc., ad infinitum...  |-)

RS> And are anal enough to think it matters a stuff |-)

BG> Probably because to the vast majority of intelligent people, it does.

RS> More pathetic faking. Just labelling your approach what intelligent
RS> people do convinces no one Bill, just makes you look silly.

Like I told that fuckwit David Scott in another message, I'm not in the
mood.  If reading proper English and grammar offends you so much, press
.  I won't mind in the least.

And in the mean time, given that I have been described as the most
foul-mouthed person in the world, you can go and fuck yourself as well. 
|-)

Regards, Bill
@EOT:

--- Msgedsq/2 3.10 alpha