"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote in 
news:scje5a19mnvmfn0ul1p7vonmc7e6u0658b@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 01:47:29 +0000 (UTC), Dustin 

> wrote:
> 
>>> Obviously your definition of inaccurate is inaccurate. Not really
>>> surprising.
>>
>>Ahh. lexicon spin. Cute, but your known for doing this already. I 
>>want to see something new!
> 
> See ya Dustin. You're not worth my time. 

I didn't think you'd want to participate in this discussion for any 
length of time. You tried to isolate a single statement I made (which 
was very generic in nature) and roll with that only. That's the 
*only* reason I took the time to write the long post. Covering most 
of the bases. Leaving you no wiggle room.
 
> I just proved you wrong. Deal with it, and if you think I'm going 

No, you didn't. Instead, you chose to intentionally isolate a single 
sentence, out of context and try to troll me with it. This is no 
different than your pathetic attempt to troll with the exevalid 
thread and the demo threads. When I posted the smallest one, you 
quipped I used a 'hacked' header. You've *never* clarified that 
statement.

> waste my time sifting through reams of your inaccurate amateur
> gibberish, well not today sonny.

I'm not the amateur here.
 
> 

I'm not the one trying desperately! to save his ass on this 
discussion. That's what you've been doing. That's WHY you have to use 
a single specific sentence out of everything I wrote. You're ignoring 
everything else and hoping others are dumb enough to do the same.
 
You are every bit the ####ing poseur IT person I've said you were for 
months now. Nothing has changed.

You're a ####ing bull####ter, period.


-- 
If you can read this, Thank a teacher.
If you're reading it in english, Thank a soldier!


--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2