From: Jeff Shultz 

On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 01:05:16 -0500, "Geo."  wrote:

>"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
>news:MPG.1872f623d24b16e598b1d0{at}news.barkto.com...
>
>> That's not economically viable in an oil field of any size. You're talking
>hundreds
>> of acres of land. There's not enough anthrax in the world to cause a
>significant
>> problem.
>
>Less than an ounce contaminated a postoffice and a HUGE building and you
>don't think there is enough to contaminate a decent sized chunk of land?

The wind doesn't blow through a postoffice and huge building.
>
>>And "radioactive dust"? Watchoobinsmokin?
>
>it's a brand called beentochernobyllately..
>
>Geo.
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4