From: "Geo." 

"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
news:MPG.1876a82769f0eff698b1db{at}news.barkto.com...

> I would argue against the position that the sears tower is non-economic.

No problem, pick a substitute example.

> The White House, the Pentagon, and the Capitol were all apparent targets,
BTW.
> "Main" target? We're talking minutes between impact of WTC1 and the
Pentagon. Was
> WTC1 not a "main" target?

I think main target is pretty clear no? Atta was the leader, figures he
would be in the plane that hits the main target. Why 2 planes for the
towers yet only one for the pentagon? Surely destroying the pentagon would
take at least as many maybe more than the towers since it's so huge? Also
don't forget the tape with osama saying how they figured the the fuel would
cause the fires in the towers to spread yet he didn't even mention the
pentagon.

I think the towers being the main target is a reasonable conclusion no?

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4