Hello Roger,

On 08 May 16 06:07, Roger Nelson wrote to Rob Swindell:

 RS>> If you're talking about SBBSecho, that is not true (it does not
 RS>> know or care what the session password is).

 RN> I think what we are discussing here is the sudden requirement for a
 RN> packet password.  For the past month or so, a friend using SBBSecho
 RN> can't toss mail from me unless there is a packet password present and
 RN> we have never had one set up.

There is no sudden requirement for a packet password. Apparantly for quite
awhile DB has been using packet password even though not configured.

SBBSecho when configured a certain way (using the old version that always
"worked" with your two systems) would ignore those packet
passwords. Now the latest version does not ignore them. So apparantly DB
has been stuffing unconfigured packet passwords for quite some time without
anyone noticing.

Regards,
Nick

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160322