Good ${greeting_time}, Stas!

06 Apr 2018 20:31:22, you wrote to Mihail Kapitanov:

 MV>>>  65  2:467/239    Mihail Kapitanov       T-6in4  he.net        f
 MK>> New address is: 2001:470:1f0b:1741:f1d0:2:467:239
 SM> Is any technikal reason to set address like this or I can use any
 SM> as I like?

When I wrote FSP-1035 (now FTS-5004) with 0xF1D0-style IPv6 addresses, I was 
unable to predict that would become almost an epidemy... :-)

Of course, you may use _any_ address in your /64 subnet. And ::f1d0:2:460:58 
would be just a pretty choice.


--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-cmlxxvii-mmxlviii

... god@universe:~ # cvs up && make world
--- /bin/vi