-> ->> ->> I checked your links. The ABC news blog quotes the NY Daily
-> News ->> ->> extensively as their source. They are a right wing
-> mouthpiece


 EC>> Of course they are, Bob!  They must be!  They reported
 EC>> things that you didn't like!

-> ->> Unless you are denying it, that was a non-sequitor.

 EC> There is nothing to deny or admit.  You ignored the news
 EC> reports and dismissed them based on your meaningless
 EC> opinion of the newspaper that printed them.  It is strange

-> Ignored the reports?

Repeating things seems to be your only skill.  You ignored the news
reports in the Daily News (which, by the way, were actually in the NEW
YORK SUN, not the Daily News!) based on you rejecting out of hand
anything printed in the paper.  Now that you know you got the wrong
paper, of course, you will choose to ignore what was reported in the
Sun, because now THAT paper will be in your eyes "a right wing
mouthpiece."

And around and around you go.

-> ->> ->> and one claims Bin Laden's son was operating out of Iran

 EC>> Actually it didn't say that at all.  It said he had been
 EC>> given safe haven in Iran.  That is old news to everyone but

-> ->> Being *detained* is not being given safe haven.

 EC> Completely irrelevant to the fact that you got caught in a
 EC> gross misrepresentation.  Being kept in Iran instead of
 EC> being turned over to the United States actually IS being
 EC> given a pretty safe haven.  He was held under house arrest
 EC> for a time, which is far different from being locked up at
 EC> Gitmo, and it looks like he was released from house arrest
 EC> in 2006.  Gee, why did they do that?  Isn't he tied to Al
 EC> Qaeda?

-> Ok, I called it an inability on your part above. Now I'm calling your
-> comments a lie.

Of course you do, Bob!  You "call" all the time!  It is an endless loop!
And you never substantiate it!  In this case, one of the news stories
said he had been given safe haven.  In your pathetic attempt to refute
the story you misrepresent it to say he was conducting OPERATIONS out of
Iran!  That particular story did not say that.  You misrepesented it.
And you did so in a really weak fashion, since there are other reports
that he was released from house arrest two years ago to set up the
capability of conducting operations.  But the point here is not the
quality of your misrepresentation but the fact of your
misrepresentation.  And you compounded it by calling a truthful
statement a "lie."  Sadly typical of you.

-> The CIA report, saying Saad Bin
-> Laden was being held in Iran, was well after July 28, 2006.

If he is not being allowed to leave Iran, that would be accurate and
entirely consistent with the reports that he was released from house
arrest in order to build up terrorist cells.  As usual you are saying
nothing relevant while you pretend that it is relevant.

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10