-=> on 02-09-05 10:19, WAYNE CHIRNSIDE wrote to STEVE KEMP <=-


 -> WC>There's a charming group still active in Matzdobre salivating
 -> WC>all over thier mutual pearls of wisdom and wit.

 -> SK>>-> Must I beat Jew all about the head and shoulders with my wang
 -> SK>>-> to wake Jew up?

 -> WC>I got all beat on for being an elitest atheist with superiority
 -> WC>complex for expressing my views about what's happening in this
 -> WC>country in the name of _family values_.

That was in Pol_Inc, not Matzdobre.  It wasn't much of a whuppin, and
you were the only one to use the term "family values" in the thread,
and then, as an attempted diversion from topic at hand. Oh, you are not
an elitist atheist with a superiority complex? - -

 -> SK> The morons that beat on you are just that.
 -> SK> They march in lock step with the current neo-fascist regime.


I think you are both elitists, for where echo rules permit, I see no
hesitation by either of you to resort to haughty name-calling wrt anyone
with whom you disagree.  (e.g.  dumb, idiot, moron, stupid, fascists,
neo-nazis, etc.)  BIR from Psych202 in college quite a few years back,
such name-calling can be a component of a superiority complex, which
generally has its roots in feelings of inferiority.

 -> WC>So I posted the text of a minister with two doctorate of divinity
 -> WC>degrees that was in sync with my own views about the loss of freedom
 -> WC>and civil liberties.

 -> WC>My only response was a cowardly one which  editted out the text
 -> WC> by the minister and offering to debate on a different topic.

You repeatedly post to ALL a long article by some preacher in panhandle
FL who also has a radio show popular there and in SW Alabama, finally
reposting it in Pol_Inc addressed specifically to me, and get all
exercised that I don't feel like immediately dropping everything and
starting to debate with you over _his_ words?  Gimme a freakin break!

I thought my challenge to you to post his views on separation of
church and state was quite fair, since you had offered him up to
everyone as an expert on constitutional liberties.  Your response was to
refuse to do so.  Kinda hypocrital, no?

 -> SK> Figures.

I had made my position clear to you over in Pol_Inc on 2/4 and again
on 2/5, the day before you came over here whining to Steve Kemp about
it. I'll restate one more time, since you seem to be
comprehension-challenged over this incident-

I will respond to your post in Pol_Inc when, and if I want to.
The timing of any such reply will be of my chosing, not yours.
Surely a Libertarian such as yourself can respect the right of another
to make a choice like that.  So for goodness' sake, be a man, get a
grip on yourself, and stop _whining_ all over the place about the
incident.  That is, unless you think you are not whining, but bragging
about it.  If that is the case, plz see above re: superiority complex.

 WC> Then he announced  he was going on a "vacation from
fidonet" to use his
 WC> words.

That statement is simply untrue.  My words in a 2/5 msg in Matzdobre to
someone else were that I feel a vacation coming on from Pol_Inc, and
that I hope it is self-imposed.

- - -  JimH.

 --- MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.46
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5