Hello Mike!
On Thu 12 Feb 1998 at 05:37 you wrote the following to Will Hargrave:
MB> Actually, you can subnet these private address spaces any way you
MB> choose. There is certainly no reason you are limited to octet
MB> boundaries. For example, you could have a netmask of 255.255.255.128,
MB> and your first two subnets would be 192.168.0.0-192.168.0.127 and
MB> 192.168.0.128-192.168.0.255. The whole point is that these addresses
MB> are entirely private.
People are confused enough by subnetting as it is.
I take the view that if they don't know the reserved addresses, it's very
unlikely that someone will want to bother with subnet intricacies ;-)
I certainly can't be bothered ATM, but I might be playing with Linux's IP
Tunneling soon, so it may be useful.
Will
====== Dave Carter for REC! ======
--- FMailX32 1.22
---------------
* Origin: that you can't even feel. (2:254/211.20)
|