AV> Excellent... "challenges are accepted only in netmail, where they can be
AV> rejected safely". Were some "incorrect" votes rejected the same way?
 
Indeed ... I would like to know :
 
* How many votes were cast
* How many votes were registered at the enumerator's site
* How do we know the ballot was not stuffed with fake passwords?
  Releasing the names of the voters without linking to the password would
  take care of thqt
* How many votes were rejected and for what reason
* How many challenges were received ... None? Says who? Prove it!
 
This was a very poorly managed election. If I were the victor I would not
accept the task and immediately call for another election, more transparant and
with a vote verifier ...
 
Amazing that the FTSC-members allow this to happen in plain view of every
listed sysop.
 
Just imagine if in R24 (Germany) there would be an election and 20% of the
votes is unaccounted for ... and a challenge swept under the carpet ... it
would be a revolution...
 
 \%/@rd

--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR40