On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 02:17:29 +0000 (UTC), Dustin 
wrote:

>Dustin  wrote in
>news:XnsA3D7CA4E16FCCC9X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791@192.254.233.145: 
>
>> "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote
>> in news:1im75a5afjan1fs6qolbfr51bdjn61j56h@4ax.com: 
>> 
>>> Well if you knew it already why the inaccurate initial post.
>> 
>> Post wasn't inaccurate.
>>  
>>> probably work, secondhand on Ebay Ł20 for something decent] if
>>> you plug your equipment into someone else's switch they *CAN*
>>> monitor your traffic. 
>> 
>> Yes, I didn't say otherwise; but unless the switch is security 
>> unfriendly and stupid mode settable (like you're describing), 
>> They won't just be hardlining into a free port and watching
>> traffic on the other ones. Not directly, anyhow. Unless either
>> configuration changes are made, OR, your WAN side connection is
>> tied into a hub just before that switch you wanna snoop traffic
>> on. So it's computers, switch/router, hub, internet. (very basic
>> for everyone reading, poohskie). Tap into HUB, snoop away.
>>  
>>> So you were wrong :) Still it'll give you something to spin and
>>> write word walls about until your departure from this life. I'll
>>> look forward to skimming them. It's a gas.
>> 
>> I was wrong? How is modifying a switch that might have extra
>> features any different than swapping out for an outright HUB? The
>> result is easier with a HUB. If you don't change default settings
>> (if the switch even offers it) that switch isn't going to let you
>> hardline into port 1 and watch traffic on the other ports it has. 
>> 
>> A switch, by default (unless you can prove me wrong here) is going
>> to do exactly what I initially said. If you hardline into port 1,
>> you aren't going to be sniffing traffic on ports 2,3,4,etc.
>> Period. Like I ####ing said, originally. Wifi is limited too. You
>> can do some sniffing, but if the wifi seperates hardline LAN from
>> wifi connections; you won't be seeing the hardline comms, like I
>> said, again.
>> 
>> Why do you even try this bull####? People can google about this
>> #### themselves, dumbass.
>>  
>
>ho hum... nearly sunday morning now.. posted yesterday, no ####ing 
>way he hasn't seen this reply... crickets, as I expected...
>
>####in trolls. I tell ya. they know just enough to be dangerous and 
>pass themselves off as some kind of expert to people who know less 
>than they do. They seem to learn just enough to get by with newbies.
>
>they fall on their ####ing faces when they run across a tech though! 
>hahahaha.. funny ####.

What a pillock this guy is. 

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2