| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Not again! |
Hello Paul, DW>>> Suppose they had done an inspection and found the tiles were DW>>> missing, what could they have done? The shuttle wasn't at the ISS. MvV>> But it could have gone there and dock couldn't it? PR> Nowhere close! So I understand now. MvV>> If they couldn't have gone to the ISS to wait for the next MvV>> shuttle, when aware of the problem, they could perhaps have MvV>> done something to increase their chances. Like dumping every MvV>> piece of mass not needed to land. Or land at a place nearer MvV>> to the equator so their entry velocity would be lower. PR> The only thing that might have worked was an immediate launch abort, PR> either back to the Cape or either of the European emergency strips, PR> but they weren't watching close enough. I am not convinced that *nothing* could have been done once in orbit. As long as we do not know what the problem was, we can not rule out the possibility of a solution. As I understand, the investigators are now leaning towards the theory of failure of the attitude control during decent. Regards, Michiel --- InterMail 2.29k* Origin: Thou shalt not go faster than light. (2:280/5555) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 280/5555 5003 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.