Janis Kracht wrote in a message to Thom LaCosta:

> Let me know when you see somethin.

 JK> Ok, saw your 'test' message, originally to Bo, CC'd to me..I didn't
 JK> see the original to Bo being routed to Bo in my log, but that makes
 JK> sense..So.. routing between you and me is working correctly.

Well, actually, there is no direct connection between you and me....I send
it all to Ross.


 JK> In your routing table you _could_ possibly be routing mail for Bo
 JK> through my system, i.e., something like

 JK> Route 2:236/100 1:261/38
 JK> Route 1:* 2:* 3:* 4:* 5:* 6:* 1:123/500

 JK> The above would say route 2:236/100 through 261/38, but route
 JK> everything else through Ross at 123/500.

Now I'm confused.....wouldn't that mean that the mail to Bo, to be routed
via you, would go through Ross, with all my other mail?  Seems to me that
once I hand Bo's mail off to Ross, the routed netmail system takes care of
that, or did I mis-understand(again)?

 JK> Anyway, now we have to wait to see if Bo gets it routed from to him
 JK> through his Z2 uplink - Or if it shows up here anyhow 

Bo netmailed me and said he got it.

cya,
thom
http://www.tlchost.net/echolist/ 
--- GEcho 1.20/Pro