| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Not again! |
-> I am not convinced that *nothing* could have been done once in orbit. As lon
-> as we do not know what the problem was, we can not rule out the possibility
-> a solution.
This is true. But if the problem was a large area of damaged or missing
heatshield tiles, then there would have been no way to make repairs in
the available time with available materials.
It's interesting that *none* of the major safety systems that are
included in the shuttle have ever been used. The backup landing strips
that are available in case of a failure during launch, the spacesuits
that have been worn ever since Challenger in case of a loss of cabin
pressure, etc., etc., have just added expense with no benefit. The two
shuttles that have been lost were destroyed by unforeseen events, and
there are probably thousands of other unforeseen possibilities that can
cause shuttles to crash.
Maybe NASA should just accept that occasional crashes are inevitable,
and stop trying to guard against just a few of the many possible
causes. Go back to shirtsleeve clothing, forget about the landing
strips in Europe, and make the shuttle cheaper and more effective.
Would any more astronauts be killed than at present? Probably not.
dow
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
* Origin: The Bayman BBS,Toronto, (416)698-6573 - 1:250/514 (1:250/514)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 250/514 140/1 106/2000 1 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.