Hello Ward!

11 Dec 18 10:15, you wrote to Carol Shenkenberger:

 WD> You and I know Sean Dennis sent-in a vote, you and I know it wasn't
 WD> counted, you and know it isn't even mentioned.

 WD> My guess is it was a timing problem, too late, but it should have been

I have no direct knowledge (not having discussed it with either Fred or Sean), 
but I suspect you are correct.

 WD> reported. Since it wasn't, it cast a shadow over this election. the
 WD> question then follows "How many other votes were not counted and for
 WD> which reason?"

 WD> This election is tainted and there should be a re-run.

 CS>> So my proposal is if any FTSC member feels we need a runoff, we
 CS>> keep it short and sweet. It can be unfair to MVDL to drag it too
 CS>> long.

 WD> A run-off isn't needed but a re-vote from scratch with the same
 WD> candidates, c'mon Carol ...

 WD> - The voting has been compromised, whether or not it changes the
 WD> outcome is IMO irrelvant - A vote went lost/unreported. What happened
 WD> to that vote and why? - The provisional winner has lobbied to have a
 WD> particular vote-enumerator - The vote-enumerator defends the outcome
 WD> of the vote of which the winner is the one who pushed to have that
 WD> particular enumerator - The vote-enumerator ruling on hmself?

I proposed that Fred act as the enumerator, based on his knowledge of the FTSC 
(as a former member.)  At the time it was discussed in FTSC, there was not a 
single voice of dissent to that proposal.

Anyone who thinks there is anything more to the selection than that, obviously 
does not know either Fred or I very well.

Andrew

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707