Carol,
 
CS> With me out of the picture, there is a query on a Sean vote?  I don't
CS> know what is going on there.
 
You and I know Sean Dennis sent-in a vote, you and I know it wasn't counted,
you and know it isn't even mentioned.
 
My guess is it was a timing problem, too late, but it should have been
reported. Since it wasn't, it cast a shadow over this election. the question
then follows "How many other votes were not counted and for which reason?"
 
This election is tainted and there should be a re-run.
 
CS> So my proposal is if any FTSC member feels we need a runoff, we keep it
CS> short and sweet. It can be unfair to MVDL to drag it too long.
 
A run-off isn't needed but a re-vote from scratch with the same candidates,
c'mon Carol ...
 
- The voting has been compromised, whether or not it changes the outcome is
  IMO irrelvant
- A vote went lost/unreported. What happened to that vote and why?
- The provisional winner has lobbied to have a particular vote-enumerator
- The vote-enumerator defends the outcome of the vote of which the winner is
  the one who pushed to have that particular enumerator
- The vote-enumerator ruling on hmself?
 
Before anyone climbs in their pen ... did you hear me say anything fishy
happened? No you did not, I'm merely stating a veil was cast over this election
and a re-run would be appropriate.
 
And I still think we have a right to learn who did not vote, it wouldn't change
the outcome of the election either ... but it would the next-one.
 
 \%/@rd

--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR40