From: "Adam Flinton" 

Last resort is all you'd need.


"Geo."  wrote in message
news:3e137dfa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
> news:3e13251e{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> > Nope. Not now that they're nuclear. Internally that might be a problem
but
> > not externally.
>
> Nuclear weapons are a really fickle defense, they are only good as a last
> resort.
>
>
> > But if they ain't with you on the war against Iraq & the war on Iraq is
> part
> > of the war on terror then they must be against you in which case when
are
> > you going to start bombing Germany?
>
> I don't believe much of what I hear about Iraq, I think a lot of it is
just
> an attempt to manipulate saddam while avoiding actual war. What better way
> to control the situation than to have your friends controlling both the
pro
> and anti war vocals? You don't really think the US and Russia are banging
> heads over this do you? Even after that little theater incident in russia
> where the US said nothing about how they handled it? Seems to me a number
of
> countries have been working together lately.
>

Yup inc the US & some fairly harsh communist & dictator govs (PRC,
various central asian places etc).

I'll bet they're going "Finally the US agrees with our definitions of
"internal security"".

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4