| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Evolution |
-> -> 3) If Mars was at one time worth life bearing then why only Microbes? -> -> What halted further development of life? Is one of the bigger craters a -> -> kin to the crater that wiped out dinosaurs? If yes then where is the -> -> evidence for the impact besides the crater? -> What halted further development of life on Mars was it's core cooled, -> magnetic field disappeared and it's atmosphere was literally -> blown away by the solar wind in the absence of that magnetic field. Decrease in core temperature = loss of magnetic field? Isn't the atmosphere held in place by gravity? And gravity is directly dependent on the mass of a body. So unless Mars lost a lot of mass, why would it be unable to make the atmosphere stick? I don't see how your suggestion could be true unless the atmosphere was rarified enough to begin with. A low mass atmosphere is more likely to be blown away by solar wind. But even if what you say is accurate ... well, it doesn't feel right to me. Life begins in a weak atmophere, reaches the microbe level and fails to adapt to an increasingly difficult atmosphere. If it could evolve to the Microbe level in a relative (to Earth) hostile environment, surely it should have evolved further. At least our evolution time scale has been faster than the geological time scale. And Mars is right next to us, not in some remote art of the galaxy. Conditions could not have been SO drastically different. Is there a book on this? --- Jitender Saan* Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 123/140 500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.