Hi all,
(just my 2 cents) Either way, if she wants a driver's license, she needs a
photo. For her protection as much as anyone's -- anybody could thow on a
veil & pass for her & use her driver's license to cash checks,
steal stuff, minors buying booze, or whateve
th the DMV on this one. Lezlie

>Thing is:  Whether the veil is required or not depends on which 
>flavor of Muslim you ask.  Some don't feel it's required, some most 
>certainly DO, and they can cite scriptural and theological references 
>out the wazoo to prove the others are wrong.  Mileages vary. 
>
>There's also a feeling among some of the stricter sects that allowing 
>themselves to be photographed is ipso facto a sin; they hold that 
>there are prohibitions in there somewhere against making likenesses 
>of humans because humans are made in the image of God and therefore 
>an image of a human violates one of the Commandments.  Or something 
>like that.  I'm not a scholar on  the subject.  Again, Mileages Vary.
>
>But, of course, either way she's a Muslim.
>
>               Albest,
>
>                        Clayton
>
>---
>R.Clayton McKee                http://www.rcmckee.com
>PhotoJournalist                   rcmckee{at}rcmckee.com   
>P O Box 571900                 voice/fax 713/783-3502
>Houston, TX 77257-1900        pager 281/510-3588
>

--- Rachel's Little NET2FIDO Gate v 0.9.9.8 Alpha