-=> Mike Ross said to Greg Mayman
 -=> about "{at}%^{at}#$%^ VEROBOARD" on 03-19-04  10:10.....

 MR> Perhaps because there is a loophole in the regulations which allows
 MR> testing a tv without any aerial connected? Remember that an antenna is
 MR> equally as good in receiving a signal as it is in transmitting it.

That's true. But do we know that the interference is getting into
the antenna?

I would be more suspicious of the wires from the processor
section to the electronic tuning in the tuner. They connect more
or less directly to the input of the lowest level stages in the
set, and it would only need a few millivolts of hash on them to
swamp the low level reception of the tuner.

And any hash on those wires would be so low by the time it got
back to the antenna connector that it would be waaaaay below the
FCC specs.

   ,-./\
  /     \ From Greg Mayman, in beautiful Adelaide, South Australia
  \_,-*_/    "Queen City of The South"    34:55 S  138:36 E
       v

... If it is not erotic, it is not interesting. - Fernando Arrabal
___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30

--- FLAME v2.0/b