Replying to a message of TOM WALKER to BOB ACKLEY:

 TW>>> Well GET USED TO the Idea as when Obama gets the Courts packed
 TW> with BA> TW> his Choiceds the EXACTIC thing wil go on here. His
 TW> Homeland Security BA> TW> Chief has already labeled
"Chistians" as
 TW> Potential Terrorist that BA> TW> bear watching.

 BA>> I've always considered fundamentalist Christians - in fact
 BA>> fundamentalist anythings - to be potential terrorists, and I have
 BA>> *always* considered Operation Rescue and various other, similar,
 BA>> outfits such as but not limited to 'Rescue of the Heartlands,' to be
 BA>> terrorist organizations.

 TW> Soem groups DO deserve the classification particualrly if they engage
 TW> in ILLEGAL activity or commit Crimes. BUT that was not what was said.
 TW> IT was a blanket Condemation of ALL christian groups as terriorists.

 TW> What about PITA or other groups that regularly also commit Criminal
 TW> Acts for their Cause. WHY were they not named?? OF course one needs
 TW> to rembember that they are "Politicaly CORRECT" while
Christianity is
 TW> NOT!!

Actually it was because we weren't talking about them.

In any case PETA, the various 'Liberation Fronts' (Animal, Earth, etc.) and 
other radical outfits all fit the description and I consider them to be terrorists
too.  As were the Weathermen of forty odd years ago.  *Any* outfit that
practices killing and destruction of property to serve their own political agenda,
such as but certainly not limited to Operation Rescue is a terrorist outfit.
Christianity and 'political correctness' have nothing to do with it.

--- FleetStreet 1.19+