Hal Roney wrote in a message to Mike Bilow:
MB> JC> Is there a minimum length for 10base2? (I'm curious if
MB> JC> there is such for 10baseT as well, but I'm not useing that
MB> JC> just yet...)
MB>Yes: 0.5m in both cases.
HR> Actually its,
HR> 0.5m to 185m for 10base2 and
HR> 0.6m to 100m for 10baseT
HR> but hey, whats 4 inches?
Actually, the minimum distance is a wavelength fraction. Since the
wavelength is, by definition, the phase velocity divided by the frequency,
the faster phase velocity in UTP (about 0.95c) compared to coax (as low as
0.66c) does cause the minimum distance to be slightly greater. However, the
minimum distance is a sort of fudge factor anyway, and the 0.5m specified is
computed assuming a phase velocity of 1.0c to be conservative: at 5 MHz, the
wavelength is 60m, so 1/100 wavelength is 0.6m.
The minimum distance is only relevant in case impedance discontinuities
produce standing waves. This particular failure mode is almost impossible
with UTP because there are always exactly two nodes on each physical segment,
so it is not really worth worrying about.
HR> (just don't ask your wife that question or your
HR> cable will be far to short)
Fortunately, I'm not married.
-- Mike
---
---------------
* Origin: N1BEE BBS +1 401 944 8498 V.34/V.FC/V.32bis/HST16.8 (1:323/107)
|