From: Jeff Shultz 

So the ideal of the Eugenicists is evil?

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 01:46:57 -0000, "Adam Flinton"
 wrote:

>Not generally. Mostly it's down to actions.
>
>Adam
>
>"Geo."  wrote in message
news:3e137a03{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Can an ideal be considered evil? Like a belief that blonds with blue eyes
>> are the only people worthy of inhabiting the planet?
>>
>> Geo.
>>
>> "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
>> news:3e13220e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > Evil is defined through actions. I can think evil thoughts
without being
>> > evil, however if I carry out evil actions....
>> >
>> > Adam
>> >
>> > "Geo."  wrote in message
news:3e122ed5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > > "Adam Flinton" 
wrote in message
>> > > news:3e115f90{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > >
>> > > > Were the people who ordered it evil?
>> > >
>> > > > Were the people who dropped it evil?
>> > >
>> > > Certainly the act of ordering or dropping a nuke is an evil act if
>it's
>> > > being used to kill people. Labeling someone as evil is
not quite the
>> same
>> > > thing as labeling an act. Pick someone you consider
evil, have them
>> commit
>> > > one good act in order to promote more evil, are they now good?
>> > >
>> > > Geo.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4