* Reply to a message in Personal.
RICH GRIEBEL wrote in a message to ALAN RACKMILL:
 RG> On Dec 17, 1997 05:45pm, ALAN RACKMILL wrote to CHARLES
 RG> HUNTER: 
 AR> Charles Hunter wrote in a message to Alan Rackmill:
 CH>> Best idea you've had so far, Alan.  That would negate the
 CH>> purpose and effect of caller id. :)
 AR> Not my idea.
 AR> he phone company iffered that here when they made the Caller ID Block
 AR> available.
 AR> At no cost to the customer.
 AR> In fact, both the Caller ID Bolck and the Caller ID Block Block are free
 AR> services.
 RG> How about caller id block, block, block ?
 RG> sorry, couldn't resist ;)
Is that the one where if you block your number, and the other parties phone 
refuses to answer, your phone sends a spike of electricity down the line to 
frie his phone?
Alan
Team OS/2,
Fidonet 1:107/101, ibmNET 40:4371/101, OS2NET 80:135/15
internet: alanrackmill@mindspring.com
--- timEd/2 1.01
1:107/101)
---------------