PA> FA> Perhaps  that is why our skeptical friends keep tabs on our emerging
 PA> FA> tales.  Because  deep down they
 PA> know
 PA> FA> in theory  anything is  possible.  And  that this  is a  serious
 PA> issue
 PA> FA> that needs to be settled one way or another..........
 PA> That is the world view that skeptics are supposedly striving to
 PA> achieve. Anything is possible, in theory, so we have to look at
 PA> what's more probable.
 Within the laws of physics. Though, you could emulate a situation where the 
laws where difference.. No sure. 
 PA> For example, UFOs. It is possible that they're alien spacecraft.
 PA> It is also possible that they're ghosts
 No likely, it brings in far more complexity into the problem.
 PA> , interdimensional
 PA> travelers
 How is that possible?  No one yet knows.  If these are not human time 
travelers, they are ETs anyway, though I would think a more down to earth 
method of transportation would be employed. 
 PA> , stars
The high maneuverability is not supportive of this theory.
 PA> , balloons
same as above.
 PA> , normal aircraft
documented characteristics are beyond human aircraft capability at this time.
 PA> , meteors
again like stars.  They have very predictable parabolic paths.
 PA> , satellites,
again the simplistic paths, do not fit what government documents say.
 PA> or ducks covered with Glowzone stickers.
well, the movement would be more realistic, however, observed altitudes are a 
limit. 
 PA>  Based on the verifiable
 PA> evidence currently available, alien spacecraft are more likely
 PA> than ghosts, interdimensional travellers, and glowing ducks. But
 PA> they're still less likely than stars, balloons, misidentified
 PA> aircraft, meteors, and satellites.
correct Paul....the fact is the skeptic do NOT have an alternativ 
explanation, I have actually never heard one, that explains what some of 
these documents talk about.
--- FMail 1.22
---------------