On 02/26/2010 09:42 AM, Ross Sauer -> Jeff Binkley wrote:
 RS> "Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer"  wrote
in news:20420
 RS> $MATZDOBRE{at}JamNNTPd:

 RC>>>> Tell us all about your outrage about Charlie Rangel being found
 RC>>>> to have violated house ethics rules?

 RC>>>> I will await your customary diversion to point out something
 RC>>>> some Repub did to justify Rangel.

 RS>>> Rangel is an idiot.

 JB>> Rangel should be tossed. You won't go that far because it would hurt
 JB>> your party.

 RS> He can be tossed by the House for misconduct.
 RS> Trouble is, half the democrats *AND* republicans would be tossed as well,
 RS> if those same standards were applied equally.

What other Representatives have been charged with ethics violations? Is it
your contention that they used different standards for their finding WRT
Rangel than they have used for others?

 RS> As is, let the voters in his district toss him out.

So, it's okay that he broke the law as long as his constituents think so?

You are an idiot.

Ed

-- 
"Truth does not become more true by virtue of the fact that the
entire world agrees with it, nor less so even if the whole world
disagrees with it." --Jewish philosopher Maimonides (1135-1204)

Blogs: http://edsramblings.wordpress.com | http://woodcaringnsuch.wordpress.com
http://edsscrollsawbits.blogspot.com

Facebook: http://wwwfacebook.com/ed.hulett | Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/yaesu

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100217 Light