JC> I think basing it off of groups like that wouldn't be obvious to me
 JC> either, as its something I would think as an optional part of the BBS UI.
 JC> This sort of forces you to put bases in group based on their network only
 JC> which can be limiting.

You can add a link to multiple groups. I don't think it's limiting anything
whatsoever. Husky tools does this (groups) as well.

 JC> I guess I'm just too used to the TG/RG/Mystic way of doing things with
 JC> dynamic groups. In the case of Mystic it uses the address/domain for Area
 JC> and FileFix to prevent bleeding.

I don't see a problem with this way either, really. As has been mentioned
previously, I agree with the fact that it should be based on the original
sender of the areafix/filefix request's address. Separate netmails for each
address, etc.

Regards,
Nick
--- SBBSecho 2.27-Linux