On 2/21/2010 11:53 AM, Stan Hardegree -> TIM RICHARDSON wrote:


 TR>> In fact, you can't even tell from the news stories on Bishop-Anderson
 TR>> if she's democrat or republican (which usually indicates she's a

 SH> It certainly appears that both these murderers were leftists - in the
 SH> Austin case, a Marxist (we just lost Otto because he has no idea what I just
 SH> said).
 SH> But the mainstream press are trying to portray to Austin man as a tea party
 SH> type and have all but ignored the political leanings of the Huntsville
 SH> woman.

 SH> Can you imagine if some relative had said of the Bishop woman, "she was
 SH> obsessed with GW Bush to the extent that it was off putting"?
It would have
 SH> been in the headlines.

 SH> This kind of thing is a threat to my liberty.

How can the media will portray Austin as a tea party type when they can't
even define what a tea party type is. all of the talking heads are telling
us there are so many branches with no prominent leaders,  to define someone
as a tea bagger type, would be almost an impossibility.

 On another note, what do you think of Ron Paul taking the straw poll?

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111