> There is no comparison between these two incidents.

 MP> There is enough of a comparison that they will be hard-pressed to get a
 MP> conviction after letting Biden off.

A conviction? There was never going to be a conviction or even a trial. There was no crime.

 MP> They need to concentrate on other charges that have plenty of evidence
 MP> and that are not ones they just let someone else off for.

There is no crime or evidence of any crime.

 > The above are all well known, the list of Trump pardons goes on and on.

 > It's all a part of Trump's continuing legacy.

 MP> We were not talking about Trump's legacy.  We were talking about
 MP> Biden's.

Yes, you are talking about Biden's legacy. I am comparing that to Trump's legacy of pardons. He has done many stinky pardons and there are more on the way.

 MP> You are correct though it does not compare as Biden's pardon of Biden
 MP> extends to yet to be determined crimes over a rather large time frame.

What crimes? Hunter is not the criminal you seem to think he is.

Same for Joe Biden, what crimes?

 MP> In other words, it is a get out of jail free card for anything done
 MP> during that time that might later come to light, and it is likely the
 MP> largest "blanket pardon" in history.

Nope, Hunters pardon is no such thing.

 > Biden's pardon of Hunter is forgettable.

 MP> It might be if he'd only pardoned him over what he was already
 MP> convicted of.

The Hunter pardon is forgettable, and so is Hunter. Who is he?

Oh, right. His name is Biden.

 > He stepped down because it was the best thing to do. He plainly stated his
 > reasons.

 MP> He was going to be replaced.

The reality is he stepped down.

 MP> I have previously posted links to discussions with Democrat megadonors
 MP> who have confirmed this.

Donors, mega or otherwise do not decide who is on the ticket.

 MP> They also have confirmed that Biden endorsed Kamala as an "F-you" to
 MP> all of the Democrats who pressured him to step aside -- they wanted
 MP> an open convention and not Harris being nominated.  Unless you have
 MP> some previously undesclosed insider information, like being a Democrat
 MP> megadonor yourself, you don't know what you are talking about.

Biden's endorsment of Kamala was nothing more than that. She didn't have to run. She decided to and the democrats got behind her.

The rest is history.

 Ttyl :-),
         Al

... I do not think it means what you think it means.

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-7