Hello Bo,

On 09/Nov/03 at 17:51 you wrote:

 BS> Hello Sean!

 BS> 09 Nov 03 14:57, you wrote to All:

 SR> I think I may have found the answer to the problem, the solution is 
 SR> a different matter which I will leave to the programmers :)

 BS> Let's here it!

 SR> About ten minutes later, I tossed more mail and now a view of my
 SR> outbound :

 SR> FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.Flo)
 SR>         6K  09.11.03 14:50  # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
 SR> FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.flo)
 SR>         6K  09.11.03 14:50  # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
 SR> FLO 2:263/93 ------------------------------------ (0107005d.flo)
 SR>         8K  09.11.03 13:30  # /var/max/spool/outbound/0000035a.su2


 SR> Noticed that 236/150 has gone from a single flo to duial flo/Flo,
 SR> something is happening during the add to existing archive process 
 SR> that is creating the second flo.

 BS> Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?

I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which it still
does but no more dual flo/Flo :)



Cheers,
\Sean

--- MadMED v0.43i/W32 (Mar 10 2000 08:11:02)